One-Liner
A tool that bundles a Peruvian consumer's complaint evidence (retailer policy archives, Wayback Machine records, INDECOPI past ruling patterns) into a ready-to-submit evidence packet for INDECOPI hearings.
AI Thinking Process
Recent-seed carry-over: Peru INDECOPI handles ~300K complaints/year, 78% consumer-win rate. Seed 1 from 20260921 painpoint. Needs fundamentally different mechanism from Mexico PROFECO to avoid template offspring.
Verb Transplant: 'discovery' from US civil litigation transplanted to Peruvian consumer complaint. Consumer builds pre-discovery evidence packet from publicly available retailer sources (T&Cs, Wayback, Meta Ad Library). AI product doesn't file the form — it builds the evidence PACKET.
WHO: Peruvian consumer 25-55 with defective product/warranty rejection. CURRENT: screenshots T&Cs, tries Wayback, submits clunky Reclama Aqui form; 4-8 hours self-effort. WHY-SURPRISED: 300K INDECOPI complaints/year, 78% win rate, no evidence-packaging product.
Survived conviction 50% (floor). Biggest worry: TAM ceiling $800K-1.6M ARR for Peru-only; founder-market fit (G121) requires Peruvian founder.
Missed in Pass 1: Reclamando.pe (Peruvian lawtech, launched 2024) offers AI complaint drafting for INDECOPI submissions. Freemium, ~10K users. Direct competitor. They do NOT do retroactive evidence packaging but occupy adjacent territory.
TEMPLATE gate failure: T2 and T13 share identical structural template (statutory consumer right + NGO/community distribution stacking). T13 is stronger in every dimension: larger TAM, more established community (CUTS International vs any Peru NGO), beatable competitor (Voxya form-first English vs Reclamando.pe AI drafting already in Peru market). Keep T13, kill T2. Conviction revised to 38%, below 40% floor.
Kill Reason
Killed at TEMPLATE gate in Pass 2 deepening: shares identical structural template with T13 India Elder Voice Refund Coach (statutory consumer right + NGO/community stacking) but with a TAM ceiling of $800K-1.6M ARR (Peru-only) vs T13's $960M ceiling, and Reclamando.pe (Peruvian lawtech, 2024, ~10K users) already occupies AI complaint drafting in the Peru market. Founder-market fit gate (G121) also fires — needs Peruvian founder.
Risk Analysis
Risk analysis available for latest engine ideas.
Loading...
Related ideas you can explore free:
killed: Open-source middleware (HAMi) already provides heterogeneous AI computing virtualization for free. Proprietary play is squeezed between free open-source and vertically integrated hardware vendor ecosystem.
killed: 5+ funded competitors including Cast AI ($1B valuation), OneChronos (backed by Nobel laureate), Akash Network (decentralized, 80% cheaper), Argentum AI (blockchain-settled). Market is claimed with massive capital.
killed: Template epidemic (G003) + industry-pain-form death pattern (G005) fire simultaneously. 13+ existing compliance tools. A prompt could do 80% of this.