Horizon Europe Research Office Anonymisation Workbench
One-Liner
A tool to automatically redact institutional identifiers from EU research grant proposals for the new anonymised evaluation format.
AI Thinking Process
Horizon Europe 2026–27 adopts anonymised evaluations + 33% shorter calls + 41 calls in two-stage submission. Most research offices staffed for old format.
Research manager at university Office of Research Services strips institutional identifiers from 30–70 page applications. Manual redaction 8–20 hours/submission, errors trigger evaluation-stage rejections.
Form-filling automation kill + frequency trap (20–50 proposals annually per office) + research office platforms can absorb this in a sprint. Two-minute direction skip confirmed.
Kill Reason
Classic form-filling automation: redaction is a narrow feature that research office platforms (Pure, Elsevier, Worktribe) can add in a sprint, and frequency is too low (20–50 proposals per year per office) to support a subscription product.
Risk Analysis
Risk analysis available for latest engine ideas.
What do you think?
Related ideas you can explore free:
killed: Classic form-filling automation: redaction is a narrow feature that research office platforms (Pure, Elsevier, Worktribe) can add in a sprint, and frequency is too low (20–50 proposals per year per office) to support a subscription product.
killed: 43% conviction below the 50% threshold — three compounding risks: (1) anonymised evaluation is a pilot that could be rolled back after the 2026–27 cycle, (2) academic buying cycles are slow, (3) structural adoption barrier is moderate (PIs may resist feedback that challenges authorship authority).
killed: 43% conviction below the 50% threshold — three compounding risks: (1) anonymised evaluation is a pilot that could be rolled back after the 2026–27 cycle, (2) academic buying cycles are slow, (3) adoption barrier is moderate (PIs may resist feedback that challenges authorship authority).